Failures – exposed, reflected, considered

Top 10 dotcom flops

with 20 comments

Starting from year 1995, the world got an extra doze of anxiety. All approaches to millennia are debates between “the roosters and the owls.” Conspiracy theories started to flourish. Anticipation peaked. Some even predicted an inevitable doom and came up with end of the world theories. At the same time though many venture capitalists and investors started zealously investing large amounts of money in all kinds of startups and pouring dollars into pockets of geeeky college grads with barely decent business plans and fairytale ideas. This era (1995-2001) marked the rise and fall of many startups, followed by colossal losses whereby an estimated $5 trillion in paper wealth on Nasdaq were wiped out.

Below is the list of most spectacular and significant of those startups (and their brief stories), which are singled out for the accompanying hype, large sums of burnt money or for manner of their failure.

Webvan (1999-2001)

A core lesson from the dot-com boom is that even if you have a good idea, it’s best not to grow too fast too soon. But online grocer Webvan was the poster child for doing just that, making the celebrated company our number one dot-com flop. In a mere 18 months, it raised $375 million in an IPO, expanded from the San Francisco Bay Area to eight U.S. cities, and built a gigantic infrastructure from the ground up (including a $1 billion order for a group of high-tech warehouses). Webvan came to be worth $1.2 billion (or $30 per share at its peak), and it touted a 26-city expansion plan. But considering that the grocery business has razor-thin margins to begin with, it was never able to attract enough customers to justify its spending spree. The company closed in July 2001, putting 2,000 out of work and leaving San Francisco’s new ballpark with a Webvan cup holder at every seat.

Pets.com (1998-2000)

Another important dot-com lesson was that advertising, no matter how clever, cannot save you. Take online pet-supply store Pets.com. Its talking sock puppet mascot became so popular that it appeared in a multimillion-dollar Super Bowl commercial and as a balloon in the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade. But as cute–or possibly annoying–as the sock puppet was, Pets.com was never able to give pet owners a compelling reason to buy supplies online. After they ordered kitty litter, a customer had to wait a few days to actually get it. And let’s face it, when you need kitty litter, you need kitty litter. Moreover, because the company had to undercharge for shipping costs to attract customers, it actually lost money on most of the items it sold. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com raised $82.5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months later.

Kozmo.com (1998-2001)

The shining example of a good idea gone bad, online store and delivery service Kozmo.com made it on our list of the top 10 tech we miss. For urbanites, Kozmo.com was cool and convenient. You could order a wide variety of products, from movies to snack food, and get them delivered to your door for free within an hour. It was the perfect antidote to a rainy night, but Kozmo learned too late that its primary attraction of free delivery was also its undoing. After expanding to seven cities, it was clear that it cost too much to deliver a DVD and a pack of gum. Kozmo eventually initiated a $10 minimum charge, but that didn’t stop it from closing in March 2001 and laying off 1,100 employees. Though it never had an IPO (one was planned), Kozmo raised about $280 million and even secured a $150 million promotion deal with Starbucks.

Flooz.com (1998-2001)

For every good dot-com idea, there are a handful of really terrible ideas. Flooz.com was a perfect example of a “what the heck were they thinking?” business. Pushed by Jumping Jack Flash star and perennial Hollywood Squares center square Whoopi Goldberg, Flooz was meant to be online currency that would serve as an alternative to credit cards. After buying a certain amount of Flooz, you could then use it at a number of retail partners. While the concept is similar to a merchant’s gift card, at least gift cards are tangible items that are backed by the merchant and not a third party. It boggles the mind why anyone would rather use an “online currency” than an actual credit card, but that didn’t stop Flooz from raising a staggering $35 million from investors and signing up retail giants such as Tower Records, Barnes & Noble, and Restoration Hardware. Flooz went bankrupt in August 2001 along with its competitor Beenz.com.

eToys.com (1997-2001)

eToys is now back in business, yet its original incarnation is another classic boom-to-bust story. The company raised $166 million in a May 1999 IPO, but in the course of 16 months, its stock went from a high of $84 per share in October 1999 to a low of just 9 cents per share in February 2001. Much like Pets.com, eToys spent millions on advertising, marketing, and technology and battled a host of competitors. And like many of its failed brethren, all that spending outweighed the company’s income, and investors quickly jumped ship. eToys closed in March 2001, but after being owned for a period by KayBee Toys, it’s now back for a second run.

The rest of the five remaining flops can be found here (among which boo.com, the biggest European dotcom failure, about which there is a longer account here). Let us not forget that the huge losses of the dotcom bust must not make us loose sight of the fact that two US corporations (Enron $80+ billion and WorldCom $74+ billion in 2000/2001 alone) probably account for more direct losses than all the dotcom spending.

Let us also remember that not every startup was a looser. Indeed few companies such as Google and Amazon were also created during that period and came out of it healthier and stronger than they or the industry experts could have anticipated.

Both Google and Amazon are still going strong, notwithstanding the recent economic and financial crisis.

About these ads

20 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. [...] a comment » Continuing from the previous post on dotcom failures, below is the list of top 20 venture capital investment failures. Names such as Pets.com, Webvan [...]

  2. Its a nice post about online shopping because Online shopping is fast becoming the most preferred mode of shopping whereby shoppers can reap the advantages of Internet shopping from the luxury.

    Mark

    November 13, 2008 at 11:40 am

  3. Excellent site, keep up the good work

    Bill Bartmann

    September 3, 2009 at 10:37 pm

  4. [...]  Dot-com bust exposed an armada of good “look-and-feel” online companies, which had no working/sustainable [...]

  5. [...]  Dot-com bust exposed an armada of good “look-and-feel” online companies, which had no working/sustainable [...]

  6. [...] a comment » I have previously blogged about top dot-com flops.  By chance I came accross this great round-up of failed startup post-mortems on ChubbyBrain.  [...]

  7. [...] to make money selling really heavy bags of food online. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com, for example, raised $82.5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months [...]

  8. [...] to make money selling really heavy bags of food online. mazon.com-backed Pets.com, for example, raised .5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months [...]

  9. [...] to make money selling really heavy bags of food online. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com, for example, raised $82.5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months [...]

  10. [...] to make money selling really heavy bags of food online. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com, for example, raised $82.5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months later. I mean, really bad [...]

  11. [...] money selling really heavy bags &#959f food online. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com, f&#959r example, raised $82.5 million &#1110n &#1072n IPO &#1110n February 2000 before collapsing nine months later. I [...]

  12. [...] to make money selling really heavy bags of food online. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com, for example, raised $82.5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months later. I mean, really bad [...]

  13. [...] to make money selling really heavy bags of food online. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com, for example, raised $82.5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months later. I mean, really bad [...]

  14. [...] to make money selling really heavy bags of food online. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com, for example, raised $82.5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months later. I mean, really bad [...]

  15. [...] I have this nice/cool product/service and will surely get customers/market share (Apple Newton, Motorola Iridium, and many of top dot-coms were built with this idealogy and resulted in failure) [...]

  16. [...] to make money selling really heavy bags of food online. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com, for example, raised .5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months [...]

  17. [...] to make money selling really heavy bags of food online. Amazon.com-backed Pets.com, for example, raised $82.5 million in an IPO in February 2000 before collapsing nine months [...]

  18. How was the perception of Webvan from within the tech industry during its heyday?…

    “…but Kozmo learned too late that its primary attraction of free delivery was also its undoing. After expanding to seven cities, it was clear that it cost too much to deliver a DVD and a pack of gum. Kozmo eventually initiated a $10 minimum charge, …

    Quora

    January 7, 2011 at 12:06 am

  19. You ђåvε̲̣̣̣̥ just saved ♍ƺ several month of research. ⌣»̶·̵̭̌·̵̭̌✽̤̈̊Ŧђɑ̤̥̈̊п̥̥̲̣̣̣kƨ̣̣̣̇̇̇̇✽̤̈̊·̵̭̌·̵̭̌«̶⌣ F̶̲̅Õ̳͡я̅ the useful info God bless

    mfon

    February 15, 2012 at 5:31 am

  20. [...] and think their high IQ will compensate for it. It won’t. The same applies to startups. Read The 10 dotcom flops for a lesson on smarts and hubris.Avoid spending time and money on bigger, nicer offices, logos and [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 526 other followers

%d bloggers like this: